Notes on the variation of bryophytes between a swamp forest dominated by Amomyrtus luma and an anthropogenic wet prairie of Juncus procerus

Authors

  • Víctor Ardiles Área de Botánica, Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Quinta Normal, Santiago, Chile
  • Alvaro Promis Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y de la Conservación de la Naturaleza, Departamento de Silvicultura y Conservación de la Naturaleza, La Pintana, Santiago, Chile
  • Daniela Cortés Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y de la Conservación de la Naturaleza, Departamento de Silvicultura y Conservación de la Naturaleza, La Pintana, Santiago, Chile

Abstract

The bryophyte richness was evaluated in the understory of a swamp forest of Amomyrtus luma and an anthropogenic wet prairie of Juncus procerus. Bryophyte richness, and growth and life forms changed between both wetlands. Because of differences between bryophyte species, both kind of wetlands should be considered for conservation efforts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2020-12-31

How to Cite

(1)
Ardiles, V.; Promis, A.; Cortés, D. Notes on the Variation of Bryophytes Between a Swamp Forest Dominated by Amomyrtus Luma and an Anthropogenic Wet Prairie of Juncus Procerus. Gayana Bot. 2020, 77, 168-175.

Issue

Vol. 77 No. 2 (2020)

Section

SHORT COMMUNICATIONS

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Víctor Ardiles, Alvaro Promis, Daniela Cortés

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
  2. The articles in this journal are published under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories, on their website or ResearchGate) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeThe Effect of Open Access).